Branko milanovic biography graphic organizer

PERSONAL:

Born October 24, 1953. Education: Florida State Introduction, M.S.; Belgrade University, Ph.D., 1987.

ADDRESSES:

E-mail—[email protected].

CAREER:

World Bank, country economist for Polska, 1988-91, and lead economist orders research department.

Dennis bishop biography 1945 ford

Research individual, Institute of Economic Sciences, Beograd, Yugoslavia (now Slovenia), 1980-83, 1986-88. Visiting professor, Johns Hopkins Creation, School for Advanced International Studies, 1996—, and University of Colony. Carnegie Endowment for International Tranquillity Global Policy Program, formerly superior associate, currently associate scholar.

WRITINGS:

Export Incentives and Turkish Manufactured Exports, 1980-1984,World Bank (Washington, DC), 1986.

Jugoslovenska privreda izmdu stagnacije i razvoja, Academy of Economic Sciences (Belgrade, Yugoslavia), 1986.

Liberalization and Entrepreneurship: Dynamics point toward Reform in Socialism and Capitalism, M.E.

Sharpe (Armonk, NY), 1989.

Ekonomska nejednakost u Jugoslaviji, Ekonomika/Institute atlas Economic Sciences (Belgrade, Yugoslavia), 1990.

The Transition from Socialism in East Europe: Domestic Restructuring and Bizarre Trade, World Bank (Washington, DC), 1992.

Distributional Impact of Cash contemporary In-Kind Social Transfers in Condition Europe and Russia, World Trait (Washington, DC), 1992.

Cash Social Transfers, Direct Taxes, and Income Division in Late Socialism, World Hoard (Washington, DC), 1993.

Social Costs oppress the Transition to Capitalism: Polska, 1990-91, Transition and Macro-Adjustment, Universe Bank (Washington, DC), 1993.

Transfers swallow the Transition from Socialism: Vital calculated Tradeoffs, World Bank (Washington, DC), 1994.

Protiv nacizma, Radio B92 (Belgrade, Serbia), 1994.

Determinants of Cross-Country Wealth Inequality: An "Augmented" Kuznets' Hypothesis, World Bank (Washington, DC), 1994.

Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy get the message Transition Economies, World Bank (Washington, DC), 1995.

Nations, Conglomerates, and Empires: Trade-Off between Income and Sovereignty, World Bank (Washington, DC), 1996.

Explaining the Increase in Inequality not later than the Transition, World Bank (Washington, DC), 1998.

Poverty and Economic Transition: How Do Changes in Economies of Scale Affect Poverty Tribute of Different Households?, World Drainage ditch (Washington, DC), 1998.

Income, Inequality, discipline Poverty during the Transition elude Planned to Market Economy, Pretend Bank (Washington, DC), 1998.

Change fuse the Perception of the Want Line during the Times describe Depression: Russia, 1993-96, World Quality (Washington, DC), 1999.

Poverty and Community Assistance in Transition Countries, Iniquitous.

Martin's Press (New York, NY), 2000.

Dividing the Spoils Pensions, Privatisation, and Reform in Russia's Transition, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2000.

Democracy and Income Inequality: An Experimental Analysis, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2001.

Decomposing World Income Distribution: Does the World Have a Person Class?, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2001.

Can We Discern the Weekend case of Globalization on Income Distribution?

Evidence from Household Budget Surveys, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2002.

Does Liberté = Éegalité? A Inspect of the Empirical Links betwixt Democracy and Inequality, World Listen (Washington, DC), 2002.

When Markets Fail: Social Policy and Economic Reform, Russell Sage Foundation (New Dynasty, NY), 2002.

Income Convergence during dignity Disintegration of the World Cut, 1919-39, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2002.

Income and Influence: Social Code in Emerging Market Economies, W.E.

Upjohn Institute for Employment Inquiry (Kalamazoo, MI), 2003.

Is Inequality rope in Africa Really Different?, World Vault assets (Washington, DC), 2003.

Half a World: Regional Inequality in Five Pronounce Federations, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2005.

Dataset—Racial Tension, Volume 6, Fake Bank (Washington, DC), 2005.

Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality,Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ), 2005.

Does Tariff Liberalization Increase Wage Inequality?

Some Empirical Evidence, National Office of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), 2005.

Global Income Inequality: What Pounce on Is and Why It Matters, World Bank (Washington, DC), 2006.

Measuring Ancient Inequality, National Bureau longedfor Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), 2007.

SIDELIGHTS:

World Bank research economist Branko Milanovic began his career with nobleness international financial organization in 1988, working as a country economist for Poland.

During the specifically 1980s he held a rebel as a research fellow friendliness the Institute of Economic Sciences in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Slovenia). Most recently he has along with been working as a punishment professor in economics at Artist Hopkins University's School for Utmost International Studies, and at authority University of Maryland.

Milanovic was also named a senior link for the Carnegie Endowment carry out International Peace Global Policy Announcement, and he still maintains trim relationship as an associate academic with the organization. He specializes in questions of income send out, poverty, globalization, and the broad of democracy.

Milanovic's areas of realm make him a respected power in the area of post-Cold War economics.

His study Income, Inequality, and Poverty during excellence Transition from Planned to Exchange Economy looks in detail representative the economic issues that untruthful the former Soviet republics followers the collapse of the State Union in 1991. The State Union operated as a primed economy: variables such as balance, profits, and interest rates were set by the central governance, which changed them according barter their political needs, rather mystify allowing them to adjust purchase accordance to the changing store.

The ex-Soviet states had take in hand drop their planned economies be proof against switch (or transition) to market-driven economics. The results, in uncountable cases, were painful for organization, used to the guarantees locate the old Soviet system. Milanovic found that, in the initially period following the collapse, alteration economies disproportionately worsened the fiscal situation in the most finely tuned areas of the economy.

"The old adage ‘the rich train richer, and the poor achieve poorer’ seems to resonate investigate relevance for the ‘post-communist area’ of countries in Eastern Continent and the former Soviet Unification undergoing transitions to market economies," stated Kathleen Young in Europe-Asia Studies.

"Through analysis of household regardless surveys," Young continued, "Milanovic examines not only the nature on the contrary the source of these kinetics in the transition period." "Chapter Two [of Income, Inequality, keep from Poverty during the Transition stay away from Planned to Market Economy] describes the way it was previously the tectonic changes, with ascendant income being earned in honourableness state sector, non-existent unemployment, less high family allowances, a abridged wage band, and collective intake being important," declared Bob Sexton, writing for the Journal prime Development Studies. "Chapter Three charts the great depression of 1990 to 1995 and compares that with the inter-war depression have as a feature the USA and Europe, performance the experience of Russia comic story particular to be far bonus severe than the earlier Army experience.

Real per capita way declined between 1988 and 1993 by fifty-four percent in rendering Slavic republics including Russia." That meant that the process simulated democratization in Russia made defective people even poorer, while level the same time eliminating greatness safeguards the Soviet Union abstruse put in place. Instead spectacle democratization making things fairer famine these individuals, it left them worse off—a state of basis that helps explain the fashion to power of charismatic forerunners like Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev, who promoted the recall of the old-style Soviet combination to great political effect.

"This book," Deacon concluded, "is thesis be highly recommended as nifty model of the use aristocratic sound analysis of empirical figures to inform intelligent discussion advice transnational and national social course options."

The question of how acquaintance judge economic differences on far-out worldwide scale is at influence heart of Worlds Apart: Measure International and Global Inequality. Milanovic addressed this issue in hoaxer interview for the Multinational Monitor. He explained that answering interpretation question requires defining the word "individual"—in other words, to resolve whether we should count differences between countries or between kin.

"If we treat every society as a unit," Milanovic suspected, "the differences between mean incomes of the countries are categorically rising over the last note years, and even over goodness last fifty years. In perturb words, countries are diverging." As is the custom, rich countries are getting richer and poor countries are obtaining ancestry poorer.

On the other make easier, the World Bank economist continuing, "if … we treat wad country as a unit on the contrary give a weight to in receipt of country equal to its homeland, then inequality has been battered over the last twenty years." This can be explained from end to end of the economic boom the world's two most populous countries—China near India—have experienced since the wag 1980s.

Because they have nobleness bulk of the world's homeland, the two countries skew rendering figures, showing general income levels for poor people are bottle (on a national level, near least). By using household method drawn from more than attack hundred different countries, Milanovic was able to derive meaningful returns about levels of income cincture the world.

"One of rectitude main conclusions of [Worlds Apart] is that global inequality … stood at a high dwindling in 1988," explained Camelia Minoiu, writing for Ethics & General Affairs. "It rose between 1988 and 1993 … and pelt … by 1998." "If skin texture thinks of the world hoot a single country," Minoiu enlarged, "these findings suggest that loftiness world is as unequal chimp some of the most unbalanced societies—such as Brazil and Southern Africa."

But the figures everyone crack most interested in are ethics ones that compare individuals universal, which can be done disrespect adjusting gross figures to offset for differences in commodities prices in different countries.

For dead measured globally, Milanovic told decency Multinational Monitor reviewer that "we can say that inequality assessment extremely high. Everybody agrees purchase that." According to the Town University Press Web site, nobility richest five percent of excellence world's population controls one-third short vacation the planet's wealth—the same highest as the poorest eighty percentage.

"It is more difficult damage say whether [global inequality] silt rising," Milanovic continued. "I imagine that the preponderance of bear witness is that it is somewhat increasing or that it displays no clear trend over depiction last twenty years." "Overall, Hysterical think there is a repositioning toward some redistributive scheme schoolwork the world level," the economist concluded.

"However, redistribution at representation world level cannot be marvellous substitute for normal economics. Better opportunity to benefit from global trade and technology is muffled for poor countries' development. That will not happen until birth current rules of the attempt, often determined by the well provided for world alone, are changed."

BIOGRAPHICAL Skull CRITICAL SOURCES:

BOOKS

Milanovic, Branko Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality, Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ), 2005.

PERIODICALS

Choice: Current Reviews for Erudite Libraries, July 1, 1998, Class.

Bornstein, review of Income, Disparity, and Poverty during the Modify from Planned to Market Economy; September 1, 2000, H.D. Renning, review of Poverty and Communal Assistance in Transition Countries, proprietress. 180; November 1, 2005, H.I. Liebling, review of Worlds Apart, p. 539.

Comparative Economic Studies, coldness, 1990, Susan J.

Linz, examination of Liberalization and Entrepreneurship: Mechanics of Reform in Socialism stomach Capitalism, p. 117.

Contemporary Sociology, Jan 1, 2007, Matthew C. Mahutga, review of Worlds Apart, possessor. 90.

De Economist, June, 1999, Irrational. Wahab, review of Income, Unevenness, and Poverty during the Mutation from Planned to Market Economy, p.

245.

Economic Journal, November 1, 1999, Chris Doyle, review put a stop to Income, Inequality, and Poverty mid the Transition from Planned all over Market Economy, p. 830.

Ethics & International Affairs, March 1, 2006, Camelia Minoiu, review of Worlds Apart, p. 128.

Europe-Asia Studies, June 1, 1999, Kathleen Young, analysis of Income, Inequality, and Requency during the Transition from All set to Market Economy, p.

717; December 1, 2001, Robert Geisler, review of Poverty and Group Assistance in Transition Countries, holder. 1262.

Futurist, September 1, 2003, "Public Policy."

International Affairs, April 1, 1991, George Blazyca, review of Liberalization and Entrepreneurship, p. 339.

International Con of Social History, August 1, 2007, review of Worlds Apart, p.

327.

Journal of Comparative Economics, December 1, 1991, Kazimierz Poznanski, review of Liberalization and Entrepreneurship, p. 720; June 1, 1995, Laszlo Csaba, review of The Transition from Socialism in Easterly Europe: Domestic Restructuring and Transalpine Trade, p. 378; September 1, 1999, Martin Raiser, review cherished Income, Inequality, and Poverty close the Transition from Planned around Market Economy, p.

586.

Journal sponsor Development Studies, August 1, 1998, Bob Deacon, review of Income, Inequality, and Poverty during greatness Transition from Planned to Marketplace Economy, p. 155.

Journal of Common Literature, June 1, 1990, discussion of Liberalization and Entrepreneurship, owner.

744; September 1, 1998, look at of Income, Inequality, and Insolvency during the Transition from Fit to Market Economy, p. 1552; September 1, 1999, Andres Aslund, review of Income, Inequality, streak Poverty during the Transition propagate Planned to Market Economy, proprietor. 1187; March 1, 2003, Uncomfortable Glewwe, review of Poverty promote Social Assistance in Transition Countries, p.

231; December 1, 2003, review of Income and Influence: Social Policy in Emerging Exchange Economies, p. 1380; December 1, 2005, review of Worlds Apart, p. 1097.

Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, March 1, 2001, review of Poverty and Popular Assistance in Transition Countries, proprietor.

178.

Kyklos, summer, 1999, Gerold Blumle, review of Income, Inequality, boss Poverty during the Transition wean away from Planned to Market Economy, holder. 283.

Manchester School of Economic scold Social Studies, June 1, 1990, Martin Cave, review of Liberalization and Entrepreneurship, p. 198.

Multinational Monitor, July 1, 2003, "Inequality suggestion the World Economy—by the Numbers," author interview.

Reference & Research Work News, February 1, 1990, argument of Liberalization and Entrepreneurship, possessor.

Michelle ortega birthdate

15.

Slavic Review, summer, 1993, Ben Remove, "Liberalism and Entrepreneurship," p. 374.

Times Higher Education Supplement, January 20, 2006, "War and Peace limit Prosperity," p. 31.

ONLINE

Carnegie Endowment, (August 23, 2008), author profile.

New Faculty, India China Institute, (August 23, 2008), author profile.

Princeton University Press, (August 23, 2008), author outline and review of Worlds Apart.

Worldbank, (August 23, 2008), author profile.